A blog exploring my thoughts on science, books, knitting, and anything else I want to talk about.
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Recipe: ginger teriyaki sauce
1 Tsp freshly grated ginger
2 Tbsp low sodium soy sauce
2 Tbsp honey
Coat 2 salmon filets with mixture and cook in the oven wrapped in foil packets.
It is super yummy!
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Ho ho ho!
My dad is to blame for my love of Christmas lights. For as long as I can remember, he has taken Christmas lights very seriously. It may have taken a couple of decades, but he has accumulated an attic full of outdoor holiday decorations and lights. The whole process of getting the yard decorated takes several weekends. He carries the ladder up the driveway and proceeds to outline the front of the house, hang wreaths at the windows, and my mom paces in the house totally freaked out that he's going to fall and break a bone. It is reminiscent of Clark Griswald in the National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation movie. I think Clark is his inspiration and that house in the scene when it finally lights up is his ultimate goal. The past few years, dad has taken it up notch by purchasing two animated light-up moose, giant blow up globes and cartoon characters, a santa complete with his sleigh and reindeer that are animated and light up (of course), and a Christmas cow. Yes. A Christmas cow. He has become my favorite. And the reason it takes several weekends to get this spectacular display of holiday cheer completely set up is because he does this all in stages and plays around with the actual arrangement of everything in the yard. Hey, he does have to carry all of this down from the attic. What I think is super special is that he doesn't forget about the back of the house. He lines the patio with lights, puts up a separate tree, and I think there is a blow-up snoopy back there too. It is pretty impressive.
My sad little Kmart tree with target ornaments just doesn't compare to what my dad creates every year in his front yard, but until I have a house of my own or an actual outlet on my balcony, I am restricted. I will say though that I get pretty competitive when it comes to door decorating if there is a contest. Normally, I am not a competitive person. I couldn't care less if I win things, but one year, I wrapped up my door in pretty paper and hung a wreath and stockings on the door. My neighbor then did the same, copying me, but she had that special wrapping paper cutter so that she actually measured and cut out the door knob. So I had to go and get candy canes to put out for people to take. She did the same damn thing! So I fixed her wagon and got battery operated twinkle lights and put them on my wreath. I don't know how I didn't win that contest...I had a light up, blinking wreath!
Another thing that I do this time of year is not only shopping, but gift knitting. Since I learned to knit, I have made most of my gifts. Hats, scarves, mittens...you name it, I've made it for someone as a gift. Typically, I start out with the best of intentions and plan on beginning my holiday knitting early. Inevitably, I am knitting right up until dinner on Christmas day to finish. I am proud to say I have never given anyone something on the needles and told them I would finish it and they would get it in a few days. Yes, people actually do that. This year, I am almost done way ahead of time! I picked a small project and I did it for my immediate family only--my parents, sister, brother-in-law, and my neice. Izzy always gets something special, and this year it is leg warmers for her to wear to her dance classes. I think I will also make her a fair isle hat, but that will only take a few days and I have plenty of time. The rest of the gifts I bought and they are stuffed in places throughout the apartment.
I even designed Christmas cards! I decided that everyone I know sends me cards with pictures of their kids on them. I don't have kids, but I do have 2 cute cats. So to embrace my current "cat lady who knits" status, I put my cats on the card and signed their names. Either people will think it's funny, cute, or sad. They can make their own judgements. I personally think it's cute and funny :)
Monday, November 29, 2010
Oops.
In other news, I sold my car and I am officially car-free. I have been having my groceries delivered (thank you, Peapod!) and renting zipcars to get around when I have heavy shopping to do. Otherwise, I am taking the metro to work and learning the bus routes and schedules. So far, so good!
So if anyone actually reads this blog, I will be better about posting now :)
Friday, August 6, 2010
A Slave to Fashion
Back to business. So I love clothes and shoes and accessories and anything else that I get to wear and makes me feel pretty. All throughout my life I have been devoted to fashion. As any fashionista knows, you must keep abreast of the latest trends. So I am a regular reader of the blog, www.thefrisky.com. I love it! It has posts from a wonderful group of women that focus on fashion, relationships, women's health, and pop culture. Yesterday I read a post about how throughout her life, the blogger keeps coming back to overalls. I realized that I myself have had an on-again, off-again love affair with overalls, too! I know I wore them as a child for convenience and comfort. Then sometime in middle school, I remember pairing them with polo shirts and converse sneakers. In high school, I had a pair that I bought from the gap that were my absolute favorite overalls. I wore them with simple tanks and sandals in warm weather and with a tee and a flannel over top in the winter. I thought that my overall days were numbered when I started college. Looking like a farmer just didn't seem like the way to make friends at W&J College. I was lonely and having a hard time finding friends because I didn't live with the other freshmen--I had been put in a building with all the sororities. I put my overalls in the back of my tiny closet and saved them for holiday breaks. After pledging Kappa Alpha Theta during the spring semester of my freshmen year, the time to get matched with our big sisters (a mentor) finally came. I received Theta-themed presents plastered with pansies, kites and cats for an entire week with clues about the identity of my big sister. My final clue the night before the big reveal told me to show up for the scavenger hunt in a pair of overalls! I pulled those suckers out of retirement and wore them with pride as I ran around the frat houses fulfilling tasks and earning the clues that led me to my big sister and the rest of my Theta family. It turned out that I had become a member of a branch of the tree that calls itself, "Theta's Overall Best Family." Hence, the overalls. I have pictures in my scrap book from that night of four generations of my family all wearing overalls. My family line still exists today, but I'm pretty sure that the overalls have been nixed. The Frisky blogger said that overalls are sure to reappear on the runways and in the stores sometime soon due to the cyclic nature of fashion. She posted some pics of a striped tee and a blazer that she would pair with her overalls along with a cute belt and some gorgeous platforms, I tried to imagine myself throwing on a pair again. Yet, I just don't think that I could pull off overalls at the age of 30, no matter how cute I think they would look with a pair of pretty platform heels. I will never say never. My sister thinks I'm a little off since I swore that leggings were ridiculous and I'd never wear them again, then I showed up in a pair under a dress. Although I did swear off the skinny jean and cowboy boot trends, and tight rolling my jeans (thank you Katie Holmes for bringing that one back). I think I will hold strong and resist the temptation with this trend as well.
Monday, August 2, 2010
Knit This, Not That
Friday, July 23, 2010
Favorite recipe of the week
1c ice cold skim milk
1c fat free vanilla yogurt
1 large peeled and pitted peach
1 mango (peeled with pit removed)
2 Tbsp honey
Combine in a smoothie maker or blender and mix at high speed until smooth. It's the perfect treat on a hot day!
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Favorite recipe
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Hot Hot Hot!
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Recently, I’ve been trying to work my way through a sizable stack of magazines that have accumulated in my apartment. So while walking on the treadmill in the gym, I’ve been catching up on the fashion and beauty articles in Glamour, Elle, and Marie Claire. Mostly I like to look at the columns devoted to new beauty products and the pictorials telling me what heel height is “in” for the next season. One of my favorites is the splurge vs. steal section where one magazine throws up pics of trendy outfits including jewelry and shoes and tells you what was a splurge and what was a steal. I like to see if I have anything resembling these trends at home. I am a product of my generation. I really can’t explain the appeal to anyone that didn’t spend his or her teens hanging at the mall.
I’ve noticed lately that these magazines also attempt to highlight issues in women’s health beyond the regular articles featuring questions you are too embarrassed to ask your doctor. I was about 20 minutes into my walk when I turned the page and skimmed over a headline that caught my attention in the May 2010 issue of Marie Claire. Anne Wojcicki, one of the co-founders of 23andMe, a genetic testing firm was interviewed about her life as an entrepreneur in the biotech industry. I read through the article and my first thought was disappointment. I was so disappointed. I felt that the author should have focused on the controversy surrounding the impending sales of these test kits at retailers such as Walgreen’s. Instead, the focus was on Wojcicki—her hair color and clothing preferences, the way she and her husband live in a humble home considering their measurable wealth, and her background and ultimate success as a businesswoman. While I applaud the journal for highlighting her as an individual, they glossed over the controversy surrounding the release of this technology and presented a completely one-sided account. I suppose that given the magazine I found it in, I shouldn’t have expected riveting journalism.
I think that if I had not read an article earlier the same week announcing the sale of the kits, produced by a few companies including 23andMe, then I wouldn’t have been nearly so disappointed with the Marie Claire piece. I had no idea that such tests were in development let alone ready to be stocked in pharmacies. I think the principle is a good one—using a swab, you collect some saliva and send it off to the company for analysis and find out if you are at risk for heart disease, diabetes, some cancers, etc. Each company is a bit different, but using your DNA, they determine if you have genes for a host of diseases including ones that are not preventable, such as Alzheimer’s. You get a report from the company giving you the statistics and your risks for developing these conditions in the future based on your unique gene profile.
While I am a proponent of what is being called “personalized medicine,” I understand why these at-home gene test kits are currently a subject of debate with the FDA. First, I would like to note that you can easily undergo genetic testing by a licensed doctor and speak with a genetic counselor. I know this because I’ve had friends who are pregnant and it seems like all of them have gone in for tests because of a history of miscarriage or other reproductive issues. So tests like these are not novel. They have been around in the healthcare community for quite awhile. In Marie Claire, Wojcicki is quoted as saying, “the paternalism of the medical industry is insane. But scientific advances are changing all that." You have got to be kidding me! I personally think that her company and others like 23andMe are offering a service without proper support for their customers. The information that they are giving to people is potentially life altering and could also cause great emotional distress. If I found out that I had a gene that increased my risk for Alzheimer’s, for example, I would have to take that into account when I considered getting married and having a family. Furthermore, a small study by the Coriell Institute for Medical Research in New Jersey, gave 44 participants a genetic screen much like the ones the FDA is currently scrutinizing. Interviews with the study participants found that one-third had shared their results with a doctor. Of these, half received behavior or lifestyle recommendations from their doctors based on the test results, but a quarter of these patients said that their physicians “didn't know what to make of the information.” I think that the customers of these at-home kits may not completely understand the results because even clinicians aren’t 100% clear on the role that behavioral factors like diet have on many of the conditions these tests examine. Also, similar studies have shown that the participants didn’t make any significant changes in their lifestyles based on genetic test results that they hadn’t already begun to make.
The bottom line for me is that it is irresponsible to give a person this information without proper education and a medical support system that could help the individual make lifestyle changes. Wojcicki’s assertion that the medical community is attempting to somehow control patients by not supporting these gene-testing kits is absurd. I think that if these kits were offered and used under the direction of knowledgeable healthcare professionals equipped to help counsel the patient, the controversy would be hampered or not exist at all. For me the controversy is in giving this information to someone who won’t know what it means or what to do with it in order to try to prevent developing disease.
Friday, May 14, 2010
Reunion videos make me cry!
My Work
I would like to note that since this paper was published, the first therapeutic vaccine for cancer, Provenge, has been approved by the FDA. My work demonstrates that two vaccines can be administered at the same time without deleterious effects on the immune system. Given that Provenge may quickly become the standard of care therapy for prostate cancer, in the future, it will be important for researchers to study the combined effects of provenge with other vaccines to improve survival. My work provides evidence that this may be possible through the development of a more diverse T-cell population to target the cancer cells.
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
A long wait...
Sometime this week, the first therapeutic vaccine for cancer is going to be approved by the FDA to treat prostate cancer. The vaccine, Sipuleucel-T, is being marketed by Dendreon as Provenge. The company has shown that the vaccine extends the lives of advanced prostate cancer patients by an average of 4.5 months. Some of the participants in the trial lived for an additional 2-3 years. The side effects observed in the clinical trials were limited to mild flu-like symptoms—a key advantage to Provenge over conventional therapies.
It is being reported that the vaccine will cost approximately $75,000 per patient. When I first read this, sadly, I wasn’t shocked. I had just read an article in the Washington Post by Sandra G. Boodman that told the story of three different cancer patients who had to decide between dying of their cancer or putting their families into debt to pay for their cancer medications. One patient’s insurance company refused to pay for an oral chemotherapeutic medication ($4000 per month) when the i.v. version was cheaper. The patient had surgery to implant a port into her chest for the i.v. When the port sprang a leak, she was rushed to the ER. She bitterly remarks that if the insurance company had paid for the pill version of the drug, it would have been less expensive than the surgery and ER visit, and she is probably correct. This article went on to talk about another man with a form of leukemia that filled a prescription for the drug Gleevec at his pharmacy. The total charge was $10,000 for a 30-day supply. In her article, Boodman uses these stories to frame her report on the greed of pharmaceutical companies and the lack of federal guidelines and legislature that addresses these very real financial issues that are literally forcing people to choose between dying or diving into deep financial ruin in order to live. Of course, the companies cite that the development of these drugs cost billions and years to gain FDA approval. They legitimately have a lot invested and do deserve to profit off of these drugs. I have hard time reconciling the needs of the patient and the rights of the companies. I know that it can take about 10 years and about $1 billion for a drug to be developed, tested, approved, and marketed. It is a significant investment on the part of the company, which includes not only the individuals on the business end, but also scientists and doctors who literally devote their entire careers. The companies like to site that they have programs to cover the costs for patients who can’t afford their treatment. While this is an outstanding service that they provide to their community, many patients will never know about this option or live long enough to maneuver their way through the paperwork.
While Gleevec and other drug therapies simply require the patient to take a pill, Provenge is unique. It is not a pill. Actually, it isn’t a drug at all. Patients undergo leukapheresis, a procedure in which blood is collected and the white blood cells are separated out. These white blood cells include antigen-presenting cells (APCs). APCs are immune cells responsible for the recognition, processing and presentation of foreign antigens to the T-cells. The APCs are sent to a Dendreon facility, where they are kept alive in culture and exposed to a recombinant fusion protein that contains prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). PAP is an enzyme produced by the prostate and found at elevated levels in the blood of prostate cancer patients, much like prostate-specific antigen (PSA), because the cancer cells produce it and it sheds from the cell surface into the blood stream. Cancer cells have multiple mechanisms by which they can avoid detection by T-cells. The APCs process and present PAP on their surface. Two days after the initial blood draw, the patient returns to the hospital/doctor’s office and the APCs are infused back into their body through an i.v. They undergo this process three times over the course of a four-week period and then the treatment is complete. The PAP-presenting APCs interact with other types of immune cells in the body. Essentially, the APCs are “telling” your T-cells that the PAP protein is “bad” so that they target and kill any cells in the body that express this protein on their surface. The result is that your own immune system is manipulated and used to kill your cancer. It is unlike any other FDA-approved cancer therapy. Every man diagnosed with prostate cancer will undergo this treatment, just as chemotherapy and hormone therapy are the standard today. For these men, the key will be how they pay for it.
From this point on, labs will be writing clinical trials for prostate cancer that will combine their drug with Provenge, as it will eventually become the standard of care for metastatichormone-refractory prostate cancer. This will undoubtedly be a complex undertaking as the workings of the immune system are intricate and easily influenced. It is well established that some chemotherapy drugs are immunosuppressive. It is reasonable to question if other drugs will effect the immune system’s ability to respond to Provenge or some other therapeutic vaccine. This is a question that I ask everyday in my own studies. Clearly, this is a truly exciting development that will benefit patients. However, the FDA approval of the first therapeutic vaccine for prostate cancer is also a significant event for the field of cancer biology. It is going to create an unbreakable bridge between the fields of immunology and cancer biology and will hopefully encourage the development and approval of future innovative immunotherapeutic approaches to treat cancer, leading to treatment options for patients with fewer side effects and better outcomes.
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Knitting Rut
I am a knitting machine. I have made countless numbers of socks, hats, mitts, and even some sweaters. Most of my knitting is given as gifts throughout the year, but especially at Christmas. I start a project and I become obsessed with finishing it. Because of this, I typically have only two or three projects going at one time, just to break up the monotony. I have found that knitting gave me something interesting to do when I am watching TV. Or I’ll pull it out when my mind is overloaded with all the things that are going on in my life—it feels good to have something else to focus on. But the past month, I have had no interest in knitting. I have three projects that are just sitting in their bags by my couch. I don’t know what is going on with me! It’s not that I don’t like the socks, shawl and tank. I love the yarn I’m using for each, so that isn’t contributing to this knitting block either. Maybe it’s the weather? All I do know is that this is a huge problem. I have several friends expecting babies this fall and I have to start on these projects soon. I have got to get my knitting mojo back!
Monday, April 5, 2010
There are so many things that I love about spring. Tulips! I have always loved tulips! When I was a kid, I would inspect the progress of the tulips in the front yard on a daily basis. When they were emerging from the ground, I would speculate on what colors we would get. I love all of the colors. I think a big vase full of multi-colored tulips is perfection. In college, I lived on the tiny campus of Washington and Jefferson College in Washington, PA. In 1998, when I began my freshman year, the campus was little more than a 6 square block area. I would walk to my 8am biology and chemistry classes and find the best tulips that week. Then under the cloak of darkness, I would take a study break around 10 or 11pm, grab a pair of scissors, and go cut down the tulips I had pre-screened earlier that day. I’m sure that the grounds people were wondering what was happening to all of their tulips. They would last a week or so, and in the meantime, I would keep an eye out for the next flowerbed that was in bloom. I have no regrets that I was a tulip-bandit. I think that having those flowers on my desk while I was studying was a comfort. It reminded me of a time when I didn’t place my self worth on a grade from a biology exam. And it made me smile.
I think that spring holds the potential for provoking a lot of smiles. It’s said that spring is a time of rebirth. After the cold dark winter, spring comes along and everything is made new again. Flowers bloom, trees are leafy green, and the birds are chirping first thing in the morning. The beautiful weather in D.C. is enough to make me smile. It’s been absolutely gorgeous the past few weeks. Other things that make me smile this time of year: squirrels (I just think they are cute), little kids in sunglasses, and local farmers’ markets. Also, Cadbury Eggs. Love love love Cadbury Eggs. I hope that everyone else can take a minute or two and find something to smile about. Happy spring!
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Sweet Sweet Tequila
2. Lobo AR, Cocato ML, Jorgetti V, de Sá LR, Nakano EY, Colli C. Changes in bone mass, biomechanical properties, and microarchitecture of calcium- and iron-deficient rats fed diets supplemented with inulin-type fructans. Nutr Res. 2009 Dec;29(12):873-81.
3. Ryz NR, Meddings JB, Taylor CG. Long-chain inulin increases dendritic cells in the Peyer's patches and increases ex vivo cytokine secretion in the spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes of growing female rats, independent of zinc status. Br J Nutr. 2009 Jun;101(11):1653-63.
4. Urías-Silvas JE, Cani PD, Delmée E, Neyrinck A, López MG, Delzenne NM.Physiological effects of dietary fructans extracted from Agave tequilana Gto. and Dasylirion spp. Br J Nutr. 2008 Feb;99(2):254-61.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
The 5 W's
So that leads me to today. I am about 5 days away from turning the big 3-0. And it's occurred to me that there are a lot of things that I want to accomplish in this next decade of my life. I also want to reflect on some of the things I've accomplished in the past 30 years. So while I was laying in bed last night, it occurred to me that instead of keeping a classic journal--with pen and paper--I'd embrace technology and record my thoughts on a blog. Now anyone who knows me will be shocked at reading this. I was one of the last people I know to get an email address. I didn't really become computer savvy until grad school, when it became a necessity. Furthermore, I still refuse to acknowledge the existence, let alone the utility of Twitter. But I'm going to embrace technology here.
About 2 seconds after this blog idea took form, I almost immediately talked myself out of doing it. "Who the hell will read it? I'll be devastated if no one ever reads it! I don't have anything interesting to say." Well, I don't care if anyone ever reads this thing. It would be nice, but, oh well if it doesn't happen. I'll use this as my journal and journals are never read by anyone unless you are under the age of 16 and have a nosy sibling. Or you do something amazing that merits people actually being interested in what you had to say. Oh, and of course, I asked myself, "How do I even start?" So here it goes.